Search Results
You are looking at 1-10 of 100
![<bold>Figure 4</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/66/4/inline-i0003-3006-66-4-192-f04.png)
Percentage of patients taking ibuprofen, ibuprofen/acetaminophen, and opioid. Opioid percentages are presented on top of the ibuprofen and ibuprofen/acetaminophen percentages.
![<bold>Figure 2</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/66/4/inline-i0003-3006-66-4-192-f02.png)
Percentages and discomfort ratings of postoperative pain for the ibuprofen and ibuprofen/acetaminophen groups by day. patients requiring opioids were excluded on days 2–4.
![<bold>Figure 3</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/66/4/inline-i0003-3006-66-4-192-f03.png)
Percentages and discomfort ratings of postoperative percussion pain for the ibuprofen and ibuprofen/acetaminophen groups by day. Patients requiring opioids were excluded on days 2–4.
![Figure 3.](/view/journals/anpr/69/2/inline-i1878-7177-69-2-3-f03.png)
Relationship between plasma acetaminophen (APAP) concentration and pain equivalent current (PEC) value (Figure 2B).
The plasma APAP concentration reached its highest level immediately after administration, but the analgesic effect peaked at 180 minutes after administration. Note that the target effect was substantially delayed after the peak of the plasma concentration.
![Figure 4.](/view/journals/anpr/69/2/inline-i1878-7177-69-2-3-f04.png)
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model developed using the acetaminophen (APAP) plasma concentration and pain equivalent current (PEC) data.
The PK model (A) was developed using a 2-compartment model, and PD model (B) was developed using a linear model and an effect compartment model. The symbols represent the mean and standard error (SE) that were obtained in 15 subjects. Open circles and the dashed line represent the duration of the analgesic effect of APAP estimated by PK-PD model.
![Figure 2.](/view/journals/anpr/69/2/inline-i1878-7177-69-2-3-f02.png)
Rate of change in current perception threshold (CPT) (A) and pain equivalent current (PEC) (B) in the acetaminophen (APAP) and control groups.
No significant difference in the rate of CPT change was seen between the APAP and control groups (Figure 1A). On the other hand, the rate of PEC change was significantly higher in the APAP group than in the control group, and the PEC in the APAP group differed significantly at time points between 90 and 300 minutes compared with the PRE value (Figure 1B).
* P < .05 (vs PRE value).