Search Results
You are looking at 1-10 of 25
![<bold>Figure 4.</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/60/2/inline-i0003-3006-60-2-82-f04.png)
% change of CAPs for 47.02 μM YOH (n = 6)
The CAPs amplitude was inhibited by 50% of the EC50 YOH, but it did not recover to the control values after the washout.
![<bold>Figure 5.</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/60/2/inline-i0003-3006-60-2-82-f05.png)
% change of CAPs for 5.98 μM DEX + 23.51 μM YOH (n = 22)
The mixture solution containing 1/2 EC50 DEX and 1/2 EC50 YOH reduced the CAPs amplitude to close to 50% of the control CAPs amplitude. As a result, the relationships between DEX and YOH show that it represents an additive effect.
![<bold>Figure 6.</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/60/2/inline-i0003-3006-60-2-82-f06.png)
Effect on CAPs of IDA (n = 6)
This graph shows an effect of different concentrations of IDA on the amplitude of CAPs. Reductions in the amplitude of the rat sciatic nerve by 3 different concentrations of IDA, measured 5 minutes after its application. The concentrations of IDA were 16 μM, 80 μM and 160 μM. The amplitude of the CAPs was unchanged by the administration of the IDA.
![<bold>Figure 2.</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/60/2/inline-i0003-3006-60-2-82-f02.png)
Dose response curve of DEX (n =16)
This graph shows a dose dependent decrease CAPs amplitude for DEX.
DEX EC50 was 11.96 μM.
![<bold>Figure 7.</bold>](/view/journals/anpr/60/2/inline-i0003-3006-60-2-82-f07.png)
% change of CAPs for 11.96 μM DEX + 80 μM IDA (n = 13), 11.96 μM DEX + Modified Liley solution (n = 8)
These mixture solutions were composed of 11.96 μM DEX + 80 μM IDA and 11.96 μM DEX + Modified Liley solution, and these solutions were made by mixing equal volumes.
The CAPs amplitude was indicated as the same value between groups.
![](/view/journals/anpr/69/3/inline-i1878-7177-69-3-38-f01.png)