Sign inSign up

ADSA Society

Logo
IssuesFor AuthorsAdvertisingNewsHelp

ADSA Society

Search Results

You are looking at 1-10 of 105

Preemptive Effect of Dexamethasone in Third-Molar Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci PhD,
 Thiago César Lima DDS,
 Carolina Castro Martins PhD,
 Cássio Roberto Rocha dos Santos PhD, and
 Marcos Luciano Pimenta Pinheiro PhD
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 64: Issue 3
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2017
DOI: 10.2344/anpr-64-05-08
Page Range: 136 – 143

combination of the following assessment methods was used: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE), 16 Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), 17 and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). 14 The potential risk of bias in each study was determined as follows: (1) random sample selection, (2) definition of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, (3) report of losses and monitoring, (4) validated measurements, and (5) statistical analysis. Studies that satisfied

Download PDF
Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa DDS, PhD,
 Diego Felipe Silveira Esses DDS,
 Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva DDS, MSc,
 Francisco Samuel Rodrigues Carvalho DDS,
 Carlos Diego Lopes Sá DDS,
 Assis Filipe Medeiros Albuquerque DDS,
 Tácio Pinheiro Bezerra DDS, PhD,
 Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro DDS, PhD,
 Cristiane Sá Roriz Fonteles DDS, PhD, and
 Eduardo Costa Studart Soares DDS, PhD
Article Category: Other
Volume/Issue: Volume 62: Issue 2
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2015
Page Range: 57 – 63

Woolf and Chong 6 described some adverse effects related to the use of these medications such as gastrointestinal bleeding, renal function disturbances, reduction and platelet function, respiratory depression, and profound hypotension. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematized review of the literature about the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents as preemptive analgesics administered orally in third-molar surgeries and to evaluate the outcome of their clinical effectiveness by means of meta-analysis. METHODS A literature

Figure 3 ; Meta-analysis of dexamethasone versus methylpredinisolone for trismus, with significance; I2 = 0.00, fixed-effect model used.
Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci,
 Thiago César Lima,
 Carolina Castro Martins,
 Cássio Roberto Rocha dos Santos, and
 Marcos Luciano Pimenta Pinheiro
<bold>Figure 3</bold>
Figure 3

Meta-analysis of dexamethasone versus methylpredinisolone for trismus, with significance; I2 = 0.00, fixed-effect model used.


Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci,
 Thiago César Lima,
 Carolina Castro Martins,
 Cássio Roberto Rocha dos Santos, and
 Marcos Luciano Pimenta Pinheiro
<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

Meta-analysis of dexamethasone versus methylpredinisolone for swelling, with statistical significance; I2 = 0.00, fixed-effect model used.


Amin Salem Milani,
 Mohammad Froughreyhani,
 Saeed Rahimi,
 Vahid Zand, and
 Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
<bold>Figure 1. </bold>
Figure 1. 

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols flow diagram of study inclusion process.


Gowri Sivaramakrishnan MDS and
 Kannan Sridharan MD, DM
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 64: Issue 2
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2017
Page Range: 59 – 65

nitrous oxide with midazolam is also used. This may bring about the beneficial effects of acceptance of the nitrous oxide mask and a decrease in the dose of midazolam used. Nitrous oxide sedation, which frequently reduces stress and anxiety in children undergoing dental treatment, is also commonly accepted by parents. 5 Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aims to identify the level of sedation produced by a combination of nitrous oxide and parenteral midazolam in both adults and children. MATERIALS AND

Jordan Prince DDS, MSc,
 Cameron Goertzen DDS, MSc,
 Maryam Zanjir DDS,
 Michelle Wong DDS, MSc, EdD, and
 Amir Azarpazhooh DDS, MSc, PhD
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 68: Issue 4
Online Publication Date: Dec 15, 2021
Page Range: 193 – 205

controlled trials (RCTs). To compare the relative risk of anesthetic airway complications between intubated and nonintubated (LMA) patients under GA for dental procedures in RCTs. METHODS In this review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria. 14 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria We included RCTs that would match the following Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) framework

Amin Salem Milani DDS, MSc,
 Mohammad Froughreyhani DDS, MSc,
 Saeed Rahimi DDS, MSc,
 Vahid Zand DDS, MSc, and
 Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi PhD
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 65: Issue 1
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2018
Page Range: 16 – 23

the success rate of IANB and the lack of any systematic review on this issue justify conducting the present study. Therefore, this study was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence to answer the question whether 3.6-mL volume of an anesthetic agent is more effective than 1.8-mL volume in providing anesthesia for mandibular molar teeth. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. 20 , 21

Rogério Lacerda-Santos,
 Thaísa Caliman Bravin,
 Fabíola Galbiatti Carvalho,
 Matheus Melo Pithon,
 Antonia Bárbara Leite Lima, and
 Karina Gomes da Silva
<bold>Figure.</bold>
Figure.

Flow diagram showing synthesis of the systematic review, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines.


Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa,
 Diego Felipe Silveira Esses,
 Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva,
 Francisco Samuel Rodrigues Carvalho,
 Carlos Diego Lopes Sá,
 Assis Filipe Medeiros Albuquerque,
 Tácio Pinheiro Bezerra,
 Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro,
 Cristiane Sá Roriz Fonteles, and
 Eduardo Costa Studart Soares
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the methodology adopted in the present study.


ANPR logo
AboutIssuesAuthor InformationSubscriptions

ADSA Society

eISSN: 1878-7177

ISSN: 0003-3006

Powered by PubFactory