Sign inSign up

ADSA Society

Logo
IssuesFor AuthorsAdvertisingNewsHelp

ADSA Society

Search Results

You are looking at 1-10 of 122

Nausea, Vomiting, and Hiccups: A Review of Mechanisms and Treatment
Daniel E. Becker DDS
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 57: Issue 4
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2010
DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-57.4.150
Page Range: 150 – 157

Nausea and vomiting is one of the most common postoperative complaints from patients following general anesthesia, second only to pain. Its occurrence is miserable for the patient and both troubling and perplexing to the provider. It is not surprising that a staggering number of publications have been dedicated to the prevention and management of this complication. Unfortunately, its pathophysiology is incompletely understood, and the many contributing factors have rendered the majority of these publications inconclusive. In many cases, this

Download PDF
Daniel E. Becker
Figure 1
Figure 1

Pathophysiology of nausea and vomiting. Vomiting is caused by noxious stimulation of the vomiting center directly or indirectly via 1 or more of 4 additional sites: the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the vestibular system, the chemoreceptor trigger zone, and higher centers in the cortex and thalamus. Once receptors are activated, neural pathways lead to the vomiting center, where emesis is initiated. Neural traffic originating in the GI tract travels along afferent fibers of cranial nerves IX (glossopharyngeal) and X (vagal). Antiemetic targets for drug interventions are predicated on their ability to block the illustrated receptor sites. Receptors illustrated along with their conventional ligands are as follows: H1 histamine, M1 acetylcholine, 5-HT3 serotonin, DA2 dopamine, NK1 (neurokinin) substance P, and mu/kappa opioids. Transmitter mediators in the cerebral cortex and thalamus are poorly understood, although cortical cannabinoid (CB1) pathways have been characterized.


Rumi Kaneko DDS,
 Kyotaro Koshika DDS, PhD,
 Mai Shionoya DDS,
 Kotaro Shimizu DDS,
 Yuka Sendai DDS,
 Nobutaka Matsuura DDS, and
 Tatsuya Ichinohe DDS, PhD
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 71: Issue 1
Online Publication Date: May 03, 2024
Page Range: 3 – 7

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia is a distressing and unpleasant postoperative complication for patients. The incidence of PONV is reported to approximate 36% (18%–45%). 1 However, the actual incidence of PONV following orthognathic surgery is estimated to be even higher (40%–67%) due to the large number of young female orthognathic patients and the bleeding that can occur during and after surgery. 2 – 4 In addition, because orthognathic surgery often necessitates postoperative limitations on mouth opening including

Emi Ishikawa,
 Rie Iwamoto,
 Takayuki Hojo,
 Takahito Teshirogi,
 Keiji Hashimoto,
 Makiko Shibuya,
 Yukifumi Kimura, and
 Toshiaki Fujisawa
<bold>Figure 1.</bold>
Figure 1.

Selection criterion and breakdown of study cases. Of the 791 patients who underwent general anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol, fentanyl, and remifentanil, 761 patients without any of the exclusion criteria were enrolled. A total of 121 patients had postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), whereas 640 did not.


Emi Ishikawa,
 Rie Iwamoto,
 Takayuki Hojo,
 Takahito Teshirogi,
 Keiji Hashimoto,
 Makiko Shibuya,
 Yukifumi Kimura, and
 Toshiaki Fujisawa
<bold>Figure 2.</bold>
Figure 2.

Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV; 0–24 h) after intubated general anesthesia using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Arrows illustrate factors with increased PONV risk. Arrow thickness illustrates size of the factor's adjusted odds ratio (OR) per study data. The strongest PONV risk factor was bimaxillary osteotomy (OR 5.69) followed by female sex (OR 2.73) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO; OR 2.28). Factors lacking arrows were not significantly associated with PONV.


Daniel E. Becker DDS
Article Category: Other
Volume/Issue: Volume 60: Issue 1
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2013
Page Range: 25 – 32

several indications for which glucocorticoids either are preferable or may be considered when NSAIDS prove ineffective. 7 – 16 (See Table 1 .) Mucosa lesions such as severe aphthous ulcerations or lichens planus are immune mediated and require the added immunosuppressant actions of glucocorticoids. Both NSAIDS and glucocorticoids are effective for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting, but the latter are more established. 16 – 18 In other cases, steroids should be chosen when NSAIDS prove ineffective or when the event is anticipated to be severe, such as

Mayumi Hashimoto DDS,
 Yoko Okumura DDS,
 Aiji Sato DDS, PhD,
 Naoko Tachi DDS, PhD,
 Akane Kikuchi DDS,
 Izumi Kuroda DDS,
 Riho Tanase DDS, and
 Masahiro Okuda MD, PhD
Article Category: Brief Report
Volume/Issue: Volume 68: Issue 2
Online Publication Date: Jun 29, 2021
Page Range: 114 – 116

the present case, a remifentanil infusion was initiated at induction of anesthesia. The initial observed tachycardia quickly resolved, likely because of the sympatholytic effects of the remifentanil, and her cardiovascular dynamics became stable. This likely masked the underlying thyrotoxicosis and prolonged the time until it was noted and diagnosed. In patients with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, the stress from surgery and/or general anesthesia can trigger a thyroid storm or thyrotoxicosis. The delirium, tachycardia, and nausea/vomiting following extubation

Michelle Wong DDS, MSc
Article Category: Case Report
Volume/Issue: Volume 64: Issue 4
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2017
Page Range: 244 – 247

clinic. At preoperative evaluation, she demonstrated frequent spontaneous eructation with dry heaving at rest, without triggers. She had previously underwent an uneventful intubated general anesthetic for duodenojejunostomy at age 22 to surgically treat SMAS but now experienced these involuntary behaviors, which are not expected postsurgical sequelae. She exhibited dental anxiety and increasing difficulty with dental procedures given her eructation reflexes. She reported never concurrently actively vomiting or regurgitating, but explained that she had a low

Priyanshi Ritwik BDS, MS,
 Linda T. Cao DDS,
 Ronald Curran DDS, and
 Robert J. Musselman DDS, MSD
Article Category: Other
Volume/Issue: Volume 60: Issue 2
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2013
Page Range: 54 – 59

sleep, nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, and fever. Table 1. Dose of Orally Administered Medications Used for Sedation of Children for Dental Care The questionnaires were administered by the same investigator (not the treating dentist) 8 hours and 24 hours after the sedation medications were administered. The questionnaire items were developed by consensus of the investigators and expounded on the items investigated by Martinez and Wilson. 8 The 8-hour postsedation

Yuki Kojima DDS, PhD,
 Kiichi Furuse MD,
 Takeshi Murouchi MD, PhD,
 Kazuya Hirabayashi MD, PhD,
 Motoi Kato MD, and
 Tatsuhiro Oka MD, PhD
Article Category: Case Report
Volume/Issue: Volume 67: Issue 3
Online Publication Date: Sep 29, 2020
Page Range: 164 – 169

side effects are dose dependent. Potential complications associated with opioid use include sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, constipation, dependence, tolerance, delayed gastric emptying, respiratory depression, and delirium. Consideration for using the lowest effective dose necessary is critical when adding opioids into an anesthetic management plan. Postoperative delirium is a major risk factor for flap loss and complications following reconstruction with tissue flaps. 3 As such, the prevention of postoperative delirium is essential to a good

ANPR logo
AboutIssuesAuthor InformationSubscriptions

ADSA Society

eISSN: 1878-7177

ISSN: 0003-3006

Powered by PubFactory