Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2014

Lidocaine Concentration in Mandibular Bone After Subperiosteal Infiltration Anesthesia Decreases With Elevation of Periosteal Flap and Irrigation With Saline

DDS,
DDS,
DDS, PhD,
Ph, PhD, and
DDS, PhD
Page Range: 53 – 62
DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-61.2.53
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

It has been reported that the action of infiltration anesthesia on the jawbone is attenuated significantly by elevation of the periosteal flap with saline irrigation in clinical studies; however, the reason is unclear. Therefore, the lidocaine concentration in mandibular bone after subperiosteal infiltration anesthesia was measured under several surgical conditions. The subjects were 48 rabbits. Infiltration anesthesia by 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1 : 80,000 epinephrine (adrenaline) was injected into the right mandibular angle and left mandibular body, respectively. Under several surgical conditions (presence or absence of periosteal flap, and presence or absence of saline irrigation), both mandibular bone samples were removed at a fixed time after subperiosteal infiltration anesthesia. The lidocaine concentration in each mandibular bone sample was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. As a result, elevation of the periosteal flap with saline irrigation significantly decreased the lidocaine concentration in the mandibular bone. It is suggested that the anesthetic in the bone was washed out by saline irrigation. Therefore, supplemental conduction and/or general anesthesia should be utilized for long operations that include elevation of the periosteal flap with saline irrigation.

  • Download PDF
<bold>Figure 1</bold>
. 
Figure 1 . 

Method of general anesthesia.


<bold>Figure 2</bold>
. 
Figure 2 . 

Method of infiltration anesthesia and characteristics of bone.


<bold>Figure 3</bold>
. 
Figure 3 . 

Each condition, procedure, and sample of this study.


<bold>Figure 4</bold>
. 
Figure 4 . 

Methods for analysis of lidocaine concentration in mandibular bone.


<bold>Figure 5</bold>
. 
Figure 5 . 

Chromatogram of lidocaine from mandibular bone in rabbit.


<bold>Figure 6</bold>
. 
Figure 6 . 

Change over time of mandibular lidocaine concentration.


<bold>Figure 7</bold>
. 
Figure 7 . 

Change of mandibular lidocaine concentration by operation.


Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Shinya Yamazaki, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, School of Dentistry, Ohu University, 31-1 Misumido, Tomita, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8611 Japan; zakiyama@ops.dti.ne.jp.
Received: Mar 29, 2012
Accepted: Mar 03, 2014