Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2016

Intranasal Midazolam Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Dental Clinic

BSc, BChD, PGDip (PaedDent), MSc (DentPubHealth) and
BChD, MSc (PaedDent)
Page Range: 122 – 130
DOI: 10.2344/15-00016.1
Save
Download PDF

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and recovery times of 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg intranasal midazolam (INM) administered with a mucosal atomizer device (MAD) in a pediatric emergency dental hospital clinic. One hundred eighteen children aged from 4 to 6 years were randomly administered either 0.3 or 0.5 mg/kg INM via an MAD in a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. Sedation was achieved to some degree in 100% of the sample. The pulse rate and oxygen saturation were within the normal range in 99% of the patients. A burning sensation was reported in 9% of children. The recovery time of the 0.5 mg/kg group was statistically longer than that of the 0.3 mg/kg group (16.5 vs 18.8 minutes) but the difference was not clinically significant. The findings of this study show that 0.3 or 0.5 mg/kg doses of INM resulted in safe and effective sedation. The 0.5 mg/kg dose was more effective than the 0.3 mg/kg dose in reducing anxiety.

  • Download PDF
Copyright: © 2016 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology
<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

Facial Image Scale.


<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

The pulse rate and oxygen saturation of children sedated with 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg intranasal midazolam.


<bold>Figure 3</bold>
Figure 3

Anxiety scale scores during administration of 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam.


<bold>Figure 4</bold>
Figure 4

Anxiety scale scores during administration of 0.5 mg/kg intranasal midazolam.


<bold>Figure 5</bold>
Figure 5

Behavior scores of children sedated with 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam during the different phases of treatment.


<bold>Figure 6</bold>
Figure 6

Behavior scores of children sedated with 0.5 mg/kg intranasal midazolam during the different phases of treatment.


<bold>Figure 7</bold>
Figure 7

The level of anxiety during INM.


Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr Fathima Peerbhay, Paediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Western Cape, Private Bag X1, Tygerberg, 7505, Cape Town, South Africa; fpeerbhay@uwc.ac.za.
Received: Mar 30, 2015
Accepted: Dec 01, 2015