Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2014

JDSA JOURNAL ABSTRACTS

Page Range: 120 – 127
DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-61.3.120
Save
Download PDF
  • Download PDF
Copyright: © 2014 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology
<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

Total numbers of new patients in outpatient clinics of hospitals

<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

Medically compromised patients and regular users of antipsychotics among the new patients

<bold>Figure 3</bold>
Figure 3

Hospitals in which lidocaine hydrochloride solution containing adrenaline was administered to regular users of antipsychotics during dental treatment

<bold>Figure 4</bold>
Figure 4

Regular users of antipsychotics who received lidocaine hydrochloride solution containing adrenaline during dental treatment

<bold>Figure 5</bold>
Figure 5

Adverse effects after the administration of lidocaine hydrochloride solution containing adrenaline to regular users of antipsychotics

<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the experimental protocol

<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

Figure 2 a R/L value (%) Figure 2b I/R value (%)

a) R/L value (%), showing the risk area for ischemia expressed as a percentage of the left ventricle. After the completion of each measurement, the risk area for ischemia was determined by injecting 10% Evans Blue dye via the jugular vein following LAD re-occlusion. Statistical comparisons of the R/L values among the groups were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's procedure. Data are reported as the group mean ± SEM (n = 8), and probability values (p) less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The R/L values ranged from 39.8 ± 3.9% to 48.7 ± 4.3% and revealed no significant differences among the groups, suggesting that the changes in the infarct size observed among the groups did not depend on the R/L.

b) I/R value (%), showing the infarct size expressed as a percentage of the risk area for ischemia. Statistical comparisons of the I/R values among the groups were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's procedure. Data are reported as the group mean ± SEM (n = 8), and probability values (p) less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The I/R value was 49.7 ± 5.7% in the Control group ; the I/R values decreased significantly to 31.3 ± 8.2% in the Pre group, 16.5 ± 7.4% in the Post group, and 19.0 ± 9.1% in the Pre + Post group.

*Significant difference (p<0.05) compared with the Control group.

#Significant difference (p<0.05) compared with the Pre group.

<bold>Figure 3</bold>
Figure 3

Incidence of arrhythmias during myocardial reperfusion

The difference in the incidence of arrhythmias was analyzed using a χ2 test, and probability values (p) less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

*Significant difference (p<0.05) compared with the Control group.

The incidence of arrhythmias during myocardial reperfusion was 75.0% in the Control group ; this incidence decreased significantly to 12.5% in the Post group and 12.5% in the Pre + Post group.

<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

Time course from the beginning of the event

<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

ECG recording obtained by the Automated External Defibrillator (AED) at 7 min after the start of the event

<bold>Figure 1</bold>
Figure 1

ECG findings for V2

<bold>Figure 2</bold>
Figure 2

ECG findings obtained using the analysis, monitor, and electrotome modes A ST elevation was only observed using the electrical scalpel mode.