Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: Sep 29, 2020

Effects of Stellate Ganglion Blockade on Muscle Blood Flow During Hypercapnia

DDS, PhD,
DDS, PhD,
DDS,
DDS,
DDS, PhD, and
DDS, PhD
Page Range: 135 – 139
DOI: 10.2344/anpr-67-01-04
Save
Download PDF

This study investigated the effects of a unilateral stellate ganglion block (SGB) on ipsilateral and contralateral masseter muscle blood flow during permissive hypercapnia. Eight male Japanese white rabbits were anesthetized with isoflurane. Observed variables included heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), left common carotid artery blood flow (LCBF), left and right masseter muscle tissue blood flow (LMBF and RMBF), and left femoral quadriceps muscle tissue blood flow (LQBF). Variable measurements were taken at a baseline end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (EtCO2) of 40 mm Hg and repeated at an elevated EtCO2 of 60 mm Hg prior to and after administration of a left SGB. HR decreased, while systolic BP was elevated during hypercapnia and after the SGB. LCBF increased during hypercapnia and after the SGB. LMBF and RMBF decreased to 75% and LQBF decreased to 60% of their respective baseline values during hypercapnia. After the SGB, LMBF was restored, reapproximating its baseline, but RMBF and LQBF further decreased to 55 and 45% of their respective baseline values. In conclusion, unilateral SGB restored the ipsilateral masseter muscle blood flow that had been reduced during hypercapnia. In contrast, the SGB exacerbated the hypercapnia-induced reduction in blood flows in the contralateral masseter muscle and the femoral quadriceps muscle.

  • Download PDF
Copyright: © 2020 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

Muscle blood flow during hypercapnia and post-stellate ganglion block (SGB) compared with baseline. Left and right masseter muscle tissue blood flow (LMBF and RMBF) decreased to ∼75% and left femoral quadriceps muscle tissue blood flow (LQBF) decreased to ∼60% of the respective baseline values at hypercapnia. Although LMBF recovered to its baseline value, RMBF and LQBF further decreased and reached ∼55 and 45% of their respective baseline values at post-SGB. Mean ± SD (n = 8). & p < 0.05 compared with LMBF; $ p < 0.05 compared with RMBF.


Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Tatsuya Ichinohe, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Kanda-Misakicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0061 Japan; ichinohe@tdc.ac.jp
Received: May 13, 2019
Accepted: Oct 27, 2019